CRELYTIC vs Dealpath: CRE Deal Management Compared
Dealpath is a deal management and pipeline platform trusted by institutional brokers and fund managers. CRELYTIC is a full-stack underwriting and analytics platform. This guide explains the differences, pricing models, and which tool fits your workflow—or whether you need both.
| Feature | CRELYTIC | Dealpath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (Annual) | $84–$240 | $3K–$15K+ |
| Primary Purpose | Underwriting | Deal pipeline |
| Deal Tracking & Pipeline | ✗ | ✓ |
| DCF Modeling | ✓ | ✓ (basic) |
| Waterfall Calculator | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team Collaboration & Reporting | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI Document Parsing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Market Intelligence | ✓ | ✗ |
| 10+ Integrated Tools | ✓ | ✗ |
Pricing Comparison: Structure & Scale
CRELYTIC Pricing
Starter Tier
$6.99/month
~$84/year, 5 deals/month
Pro Tier
$12.99/month
~$156/year, 25 deals/month
Unlimited Tier
$19.99/month
~$240/year, unlimited deals
All tiers: unlimited users on same account. No per-seat fees.
Dealpath Pricing
Small Team
$3K–$6K/year
Up to 5 users
Mid-Market
$6K–$12K/year
5–20 users
Enterprise
$12K–$15K+/year
20+ users, custom features
Per-seat licensing. Enterprise customers may pay more with customization.
Cost Comparison: A 5-person team: Dealpath costs ~$5,000/year; CRELYTIC Unlimited costs $240/year—a 95% savings. For enterprise teams (20+ users), Dealpath can reach $15K+/year; CRELYTIC remains $240/year.
Platform Positioning: Pipeline vs Analytics
Dealpath and CRELYTIC solve different problems in the deal funnel. Both are essential for larger institutional teams, but they address opposite ends of the workflow.
◆ CRELYTIC (Deal Analysis):
- ✓ Deep deal underwriting
- ✓ DCF modeling & returns
- ✓ Waterfall structuring
- ✓ Lease analysis
- ✓ AI document parsing
- ✓ Market intelligence
- ✗ No pipeline tracking
- ✗ No team collaboration
◆ Dealpath (Deal Pipeline):
- ✓ Deal tracking & stages
- ✓ Team collaboration
- ✓ Broker integration
- ✓ Reporting & dashboards
- ✓ Contact management
- ✓ 10+ year track record
- ✗ Limited underwriting
- ✗ No AI parsing
The Workflow Difference
Dealpath helps you manage deals that are in play: tracking brokers, deal stages, timelines, and stakeholder communication. CRELYTIC helps you evaluate deals that interest you: modeling returns, analyzing tenant quality, structuring equity.
A typical workflow: Use Dealpath to track 100 deals in pipeline. When one reaches "under analysis" stage, open CRELYTIC to underwrite it. Both tools fill different slots in the same workflow.
Feature-by-Feature Analysis
Deal Pipeline Management
CRELYTIC
Not a pipeline tool. Designed for analyzing individual deals. No deal tracking or workflow stages.
Dealpath
Comprehensive deal tracking: stages, timelines, stakeholders, broker relationships. Built for institutional workflow management.
Edge: Dealpath (pipeline management is its core strength)
Financial Underwriting & DCF Modeling
CRELYTIC
Full DCF with sensitivity analysis, scenario modeling, hold period flexibility. Deep financial underwriting capability.
Dealpath
Basic deal valuation and metrics. Can store DCF results, but not a deep modeling engine. Limited to summary-level analysis.
Edge: CRELYTIC (underwriting depth is its core strength)
Waterfall & Equity Structuring
CRELYTIC Only
Dedicated waterfall calculator for preferred return analysis, IRR, and investor distributions. Critical for syndications.
Dealpath does not offer waterfall modeling.
Win: CRELYTIC
Team Collaboration & Reporting
Dealpath Only
Built for institutional teams: shared workflows, activity tracking, deal stage notifications, portfolio dashboards, deal summaries for stakeholders.
CRELYTIC is a personal analysis tool. No team collaboration or portfolio reporting features.
Win: Dealpath
AI Document Parsing
CRELYTIC Only
AI extracts rent rolls, operating statements, loan docs. 95%+ accuracy. Saves 2–3 hours per deal on data prep.
Dealpath requires manual document uploads and entry.
Win: CRELYTIC
Who Should Choose Which Platform?
Choose CRELYTIC If You:
- ✓ Are a solo investor or small team (1–5 people)
- ✓ Analyze 5–100+ deals annually
- ✓ Need deep financial underwriting and DCF modeling
- ✓ Want AI to parse documents automatically
- ✓ Require waterfall structuring for syndications
- ✓ Are budget-conscious ($84–$240/year)
- ✓ Prefer simplicity over institutional collaboration
Choose Dealpath If You:
- ✓ Are an institutional team (10–100+ people)
- ✓ Manage large deal pipelines (100+ opportunities)
- ✓ Need cross-team collaboration and reporting
- ✓ Work closely with brokers and external partners
- ✓ Track deals across multiple stages and timelines
- ✓ Have institutional software budgets ($3K–$15K/year)
- ✓ Want proven, 10+ year track record
The Complementary Strategy: Using Both
Many institutional teams use Dealpath and CRELYTIC together:
- 1. Deal sourcing: Track 200 deals in Dealpath pipeline
- 2. Deal moves to "analysis": Open CRELYTIC to underwrite
- 3. CRELYTIC parses documents, models DCF, structures waterfall
- 4. Export results back to Dealpath for team review
- 5. Dealpath tracks decision and next steps
For a 10-person team: Dealpath ($6K/year) + CRELYTIC Unlimited ($240/year) = $6,240/year total. A 95% discount vs Dealpath alone, with superior underwriting.
The Bottom Line
Dealpath is a proven deal management platform for institutional teams managing large pipelines. It excels at workflow tracking, team collaboration, and stakeholder reporting—essential for 10+ person teams with 100+ deal opportunities.
CRELYTIC is a personal underwriting and analytics tool for analyzing deals deeply—DCF modeling, waterfall structuring, lease analysis, AI parsing. It's built for small teams and solo investors, at 1% of Dealpath's cost.
For small teams (1–5 people): CRELYTIC alone ($240/year) is sufficient. For institutional teams (10–100+): Use Dealpath for pipeline management ($6K–$15K/year) and CRELYTIC for deep underwriting ($240/year). The combo delivers broader functionality at lower total cost than Dealpath alone.
Verdict: Dealpath wins on pipeline management. CRELYTIC wins on underwriting depth and affordability. Best approach: combine both for institutions, use CRELYTIC alone for smaller teams.
Ready to Try CRELYTIC?
Start analyzing deals with the Engine at just $6.99/month. Full DCF modeling, waterfall structuring, AI document parsing, and market intelligence—all integrated. No credit card required.
Start Free Trial on CRELYTIC EngineOr explore Pro ($12.99/mo) for 25 deals, or Unlimited ($19.99/mo) for enterprise teams.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can CRELYTIC replace Dealpath?
For underwriting, yes—CRELYTIC has superior DCF, waterfall, and AI parsing. For pipeline management, no—Dealpath excels at tracking deals, team collaboration, and institutional workflows. For small teams (1–5), CRELYTIC alone is fine. For institutional teams, use both: Dealpath for pipeline, CRELYTIC for underwriting.
Is Dealpath better than CRELYTIC?
Better depends on your needs. Dealpath wins on deal tracking and team collaboration. CRELYTIC wins on underwriting depth, AI parsing, and cost. A 10-person team benefits from both: Dealpath ($6K/year) manages pipelines, CRELYTIC ($240/year) provides superior underwriting—total $6,240/year.
How much does Dealpath cost vs CRELYTIC?
CRELYTIC: $84–$240/year (all users on same account)
Dealpath: $3K–$15K+/year (per-seat licensing). A 5-person team costs ~$5K/year; a 10-person team costs ~$9K/year.
Should I use both Dealpath and CRELYTIC?
For institutional teams (10+ people), yes. Use Dealpath to manage deal pipelines and track progress. Use CRELYTIC to deeply underwrite deals when they reach "analysis" stage. For small teams (1–5), CRELYTIC alone is sufficient and more cost-effective.